![]() ![]() ![]() Thus, the fundamental role played by lock-in mechanisms in the maintenance of the existing regimes in sustainable transitions is confirmed. No such mechanism exists for the analysis of readiness. So, the research question addressed is: can we systematically select cases to apply process tracing in the explanation of sustainable urban transitions? The present work, by applying a systematic approach in the selection of the cases to which to apply process tracing, verifies the existence of a causal mechanism among the causal conditions that explains the denial of cities’ readiness to implement mobility innovations that can be extrapolated. Although previous work has complemented QCA analysis with process tracing, it did not apply a systematic approach to case selection. Identifying causal mechanisms requires complementing this analysis with process tracing, the Set Theoretic Multi-Method Research (SMMR). In the study of sustainable transitions, Qualitative Comparative Analysis is used to identify the causal conditions that generate the outcomes. ![]() Within transitions, the acceleration phase has been little studied, perhaps because it relies on the mechanisms linked to the causes that lead to the desired effects. The remainder of the chapter discusses the case selection and provides an overview of the food safety governance designs of the 15 EU countries under scrutiny.Ĭities around the world are betting on sustainable transitions as a formula to respond to some of the challenges they face. The chapter shows how food safety regulation is an illustrative and likely case for assessing the impact that the institutional features of monitoring and enforcement exert over operational outcomes and, thus, over effectiveness of regulation. This methodological approach enables me to provide a range of institutional configurations of causal conditions and to explore the links of the institutional configurations to the outcome (effectiveness of food safety regulation) through (combinations of) necessary and sufficient conditions. Drawing upon the IAD assumption about the configurational nature of institutions, the chapter explains the choice of employing Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). This study applies systematic cross-case comparison, by identifying regularities and focusing on the configurations that unfold their effects. This chapter addresses the research design by tackling both methodological and ontological questions. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |